Right Fashion Style

Right Fashion Style

Tenents in Sustainable Fashion

This blog briefly goes over some of the Tenents in Sustainable Fashion guiding ideologies of sustainable fashion. In order to clarify some of the complexities surrounding sustainability concerns in the fashion industry.

Tenents in Sustainable Fashion

Tenents in Sustainable Fashion

There are numerous opportunities to reduce environmental effect throughout each of these stages. As fashion manufacturing has shifted over the past 25 years to lower cost countries, primarily in Asia and the Far East, ethical and environmental issues have recently come up for discussion and have attracted a lot of attention.

Consumption of fashion is not sustainable due to current design, manufacturing, and economic systems. The entire situation might be viewed as a complicated problem requiring imaginative problem solution, courageous design thinking, challenging established norms, and open collaboration amongst various commercial and industrial partners.

Tenents in Sustainable Fashion Clothing’s environmental impact can be reduced during the following processes:

  • Fibre production, finishing, dyeing, and printing
  • Worldwide logistics during manufacture and sales
  • Use and maintenance of the product; and product disposal.

Garment Consumption And The Fashion Industry

The following paragraphs provide some key statistics on the global textile and high-fashion industries to help you grasp the scope of the problem in the current fashion system, which was first noted in the 1980s with the industry’s growth standing at 143 percent between 1979 and 1990 at the global level.

One of the largest and oldest industrial sectors in the world, the textile and fashion industry is expected to experience a 430 percent increase in textile exports during that time. Its procedures utilize more water. On the consumer side, there is clearly faster growth than in any other sector outside of agriculture.

For instance, the consumption of fashion in the UK has surged by 37% since 2001, releasing enormous amounts of hazardous chemicals into the environment. The entire volume of textile and and 2005 (estimated per capita clothing consumption based on worldwide fashion output) (Allwood et al.2006).

Tenents in Sustainable Fashion- The volume of clothing and household textiles discharged annually in Sweden is estimated to be over 30 million tones. As a result, the market’s environmental effects increased by 40% between the years (Chen & Burns 2006). The textile and apparel sector has advanced as of 2012).

Asiatic and Far Eastern countries for the last 25 years, which, for a population of 5 426 674, equals years, have sold a total of 70 212 tones of clothing in Finland in 2010. For instance, each person in Finland consumed 13 kg of textiles on average during the watershed year. It was 1987, and exports of clothes and textiles were up.

Tenents in Sustainable Fashion- The next year, these figures were in the opposite direction due to Western overconsumption, which led to environmental and socioeconomic issues on the other side of the world, where the fibres are grown and garments are produced.

Consumption Growth

Today, it is estimated that roughly 95 percent of sold clothing in Fin- woven, coloured, and finished with chemicals, and land, for example, are imported; this percentage is largely the same. cost-effective mass manufacturing in all Western nations (mostly between 90- countries has brought about low end-prices of 95 percent ). And production has expanded beyond clothing.

Cheap product costs encourage extended logistical supply chains, but they also encourage impulsive buying and unsustainable growth. The global tile business is thought to have grown by 25% between 2002 and 2010 due to excessive consumption, very quick product turnover, and premature disposal (Economy Watch 29.6.2010).

Consumption growth is accompanied by an increase in textile waste streams. The average American consumer discards 31 kg of textiles and apparel annually, the most of which (approximately 85 percent) wind up in landfills. In the UK, it is estimated that over 900 billion pieces of clothing are discarded annually (Brown 2010). Consumers in Finland trash roughly 17 kg of textiles and clothes annually, with 75% of it ending up in landfills.

Oversaturated Fashion Marketplaces

Tenents in Sustainable Fashion- The globe is flooded with new fashion items, fashion stores, and unsold clothing due to the oversaturated fashion marketplaces and the highly efficient mass manufacturing system. Discounted sales in clothing stores seem to be a recurring trend.

In addition, not all new clothing even makes it to the market; some end up in landfills right away due to poor quality. Additionally, because there are too many options on the market, which is oversaturated, certain garments are never sold to customers from the store. Nobody seems to genuinely be aware of how many of these unsold clothes wind up in landfills.

These unsold items are thought to make up as much as 5 to 10 percent of the entire fashion production. In order to protect their brands’ reputations in this risky industry, fashion corporations would rather destroy the unsold items than mark them down and release an excessive amount of them to the market.

Sustainability in Fashion Industry

By collaborating with designers in novel ways using these unsold clothing, some fashion corporations are attempting to establish a favorable reputation. Young designers may occasionally be asked to develop original fashion collections using unsold garments. With the aid of the media, these refurbished collections are displayed at social gatherings.

This tendency was demonstrated at the second Reuse Republic event in Helsinki (8–9 April 2011), where thirteen young designers presented their original clothing made from donated pre-consumer clothing from fashion brands. An estimated 5% of household environmental impact and carbon emissions are attributed to textile and apparel usage.

Even though that number is relatively low, textile and clothing consumption is constantly rising (see, for example, Spangenberg 2001), and the more recent shortening of the lifespans of particularly fast fashion items increases the industry’s environmental burden: all those resources are wasted if the clothing is worn for only a very brief period of time or even not at all.

In addition, the problem of textile waste is getting worse in every Western nation, and the chemical burden of the textile industry is a major issue in Asia. The issue is that most textiles are not designed to be compostable, which prevents them from decomposing in landfills (polyester does not decompose at all whereas some natural materials do, but frequently too slowly).

The majority of clothing is constructed of blended materials that are unsuitable for composting, and fibres often contain harmful chemicals, colors, and finishing’s. Composting is also detrimental to the environment since it generates a lot of methane, which increases greenhouse gas emissions and contributes to global warming.

Incursion of Western Clothing

Many shoppers give their used clothing to charity stores, where some of the items are sold again to shoppers and others are sent elsewhere, like Africa. The incursion of Western clothing into Africa has significantly reduced native textile and apparel production.

In this sense, Western consumers have shifted their consumption issues to the developing world while also contributing to the cultural destruction of regional textile traditions and local industry. When environmental thinking first emerged in the 1970s, it concentrated more narrowly on finding solutions to the waste issues brought on by industrial production.

In contrast, contemporary sustainable thinking seeks to strike a balance between the efficient use of economic, social, and environmental resources and the protection of future generations’ capacity to meet their needs in a sustainable manner. The term “triple bottom line” refers to the idea of profitably balancing the three spheres of people, planet, and the environment.

Additionally, ethical and value-based thinking are now included in sustainable design and business strategies. It is more customary to concentrate on one specific, more constrained approach to eco-design and sustainability, even though truly sustainable thinking is fairly broad and requires a comprehensive knowledge and approach on many levels.

Conclusion

for instance, emphasizing the effects of manufacturing on the environment, replacing materials with eco-materials, or concentrating on moral concerns in manufacturing (e.g. CSR, corporate social responsibility). The usage of eco-labels demonstrates the same kind of constrained thinking. Even if all of the aforementioned strategies are significant and it is encouraging that businesses are interested in eco- and sustainable fashion, holistic thinking contends that these tactics are constrained and frequently fail to address the true problem areas. Because of this, such limited solutions cannot address the overproduction and overconsumption of clothing, which is the real issue.

Life cycle thinking, which considers all processes including design, production, logistics, retail, use, and disposal, should be applied to sustainable fashion. It is stated that designing life cycles rather than goods is preferable; sustainable design takes use phase and end-of-life thinking into account. The product should be built such that it can be used after the initial life cycle is complete if it has the potential to have more than one.

*Also Read*

Leave a Comment